Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password
 

  • April 21, 2009

    Hunting Honeymoon-3

    by
    Rate 0%0%

    You might say that Bruce and Rene Thompson’s marriage started off with a bang.

    And no, it wasn’t what you'd call a “shotgun wedding.” But that said, a 12-gauge did play a major part in the couple’s honeymoon.

    The newlyweds, who hail from Louisville, Tenn., tied the knot in Jamaica, but flew back to the states to spend their honeymoon turkey hunting in east Tennessee.

    Outdoors scribe Bob Hodge, writes in the Knoxville News-Sentinel that when the couple’s plane landed at the Atlanta airport, their car was already loaded with their guns, calls and camo gear—and they drove directly to AEDC Wildlife Management Area (near Chattanooga, Tenn.). 

    Once there, they slept in the car, then at daylight on opening day started hunting.

    It wasn’t long before Bruce got a turkey to gobble, Hodge wrote. They put a decoy out and about 10 minutes after that Rene had a 17-pound jake with a 4-inch beard on the ground.

    “Bruce would call and it would gobble and to be able to experience that was great,” she said. “Bruce was telling me to move a little this way and stuff and then I saw it coming in.”

    Just in case you’re wondering, Rene put on her wedding gown after she killed the gobbler, just to pose for photos. It was part of the pact the two lovebirds made prior to the hunt.

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 18, 2009

    Rush Is Wrong-28

    by
    Rate 0%0%

     

    Why is Rush Limbaugh against hunting?

    I can accept that Rush Limbaugh isn't a hunter, but his apparent alliance with the most insidious of anti-hunting groups makes me wonder if he needs to check his prescription medicine. 
    As one of most influential voices of America's conservatives, Limbaugh is one of those few people who easily can be identified by just one name. Since President Obama's election, Rush's daily radio commentary has become essential fodder for neo-conservatives, for moderate Republicans and for millions of Americans who want to restore some common sense and restraint to the country.

    So why is this golden-voiced partisan climbing- no, leaping- in bed with arguably the most dangerous anti-hunting group in the country, the Humane Society of the United States?

    Maybe Rush had a particularly good experience with pet adoption and (wrongly) wants to credit the Humane Society for operating a local animal shelter. Or maybe he bought their malarkey about being the voice for helpless animals, including his beloved cat Punkin'. One radio spot that's getting plenty of airtime is his fawning description of the Humane Society's somewhat marginal role in clamping down on dog fighting. (For the record, the Humane Society doesn't have a monopoly on wanting to rid the nation of dog fighting.)

    Whatever his motivation, Rush's embrace of the Humane Society of the United States is shortsighted and dangerous to those of us who love to hunt and fish.

    Apparently no one told Rush that the HSUS wants to end hunting in America, aims to give animals the same legal protections afforded to humans and lobbies to end traditional agricultural methods that could ruin rural communities across the world.

    The Humane Society has bankrolled every major piece of legislation, lawsuit or ballot issue that would restrict the rights of Americans to hunt. They have tried to ban the hunting of America's number one game bird, the mourning dove. The Humane Society successfully lobbied for cancellation of New Jersey's black bear hunt. The group continues its fight against the Families Afield initiative to get more youth involved in hunting and outdoor activities. The group is suing the federal government to reinstate Endangered Species protection to western gray wolves.

    Maybe Rush sees something in the Humane Society that the rest of us have missed. Let's give him the chance to explain himself. I encourage all hunters, fisherman and trappers around the nation to call Rush's radio show and get his perspective. Call his toll-free line at 1-800-282-2882 from noon to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on weekdays or email Rush at elrushbo@eibnet.com. Or you can mail a letter to:

    The Rush Limbaugh Show 1270 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020

    Rush is too smart, too experienced and too clued in to the issues of America outside the Big Apple or the Beltway to be duped by the Humane Society. Call him up and see what he has to say for himself, and more importantly, why America's hunters and outdoorsmen should still listen to his show.

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 17, 2009

    In Cold Blood-10

    by
    Rate 0%0%

    If there was ever any question about wolves being ruthless and indiscriminate killers, this week’s story out of Eastern Oregon will dispel any doubt you may have.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife have confirmed that wolves were responsible for killing nearly two dozen lambs on Curt Jacobs’ Baker City, Ore.-area ranch in separate attacks in recent weeks. The attacks were the first documented losses of livestock to wolves since the predators returned to the state in 1999. 

    After the first attack on April 9, four digital trail cameras placed on fenceposts by ODFW wolf coordinator Russ Morgan captured the images of two wolves when they returned April 12 or 13 for more lamb-killing.

    As further evidence of the specie’s cold-blooded nature, only a few of the lambs had been fed upon. In addition to the 23 lambs that were killed, several others were seriously wounded and may have to be euthanized.

    Unlike in neighboring states where the reintroduced predator has a large, sustained population like Idaho and Montana, wolves remain protected as state endangered species in Oregon. The state’s wolf management plan does not allow ranchers to shoot wolves, even if they catch them killing livestock.

    Though the gray wolf is scheduled to be removed from the federal endangered species list on May 5, the policy in Oregon would remain unchanged—a fact that has revived contentious debate over whether ranchers should be allowed to shoot wolves on sight. 

    “It’s all right to have the animal be here,” rancher Jacobs said in a newspaper report of the sheep killings. “But if every time you went to work in the morning, somebody stopped you and took your lunch pail and you couldn’t say nothing about it, it would get old after awhile.” 

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 16, 2009

    Why Bass Get Caught-3

    by
    Rate 0%0%

    A fascinating new study suggests that some largemouth bass are inherently more susceptible to being caught by anglers that others.

    A University of Illinois experiment spanning 20 years has found that a largemouth’s propensity for chasing the offerings of fishermen is passed down from generation to generation of bass.

    The findings of the study, “Selection for Vulnerability to Angling in Largemouth Bass” appears in the most recent issue of Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.

    A press release from the University of Illinois reports that the study began in 1975 with the resident population of bass in Ridge Lake, an experimental study lake in Fox Ridge State Park in Charleston. Through rigidly controlled fishing, each fish caught was tagged prior to release.

    “We kept track over four years of all of the angling that went on, and we have a total record—there were thousands of captures,” said David Philipp, ecology and conservation researcher at U of I. “Many fish were caught more than once. One fish was caught three times in the first two days, and another was caught 16 times in one year.”

    In 1979, the lake was completely drained and 1,700 bass were collected.

    “Interestingly, about 200 of those fish had never been caught, even though they had been in the lake the entire four years,” Philipp said.

    Males and females from the group that had never been caught were designated Low Vulnerability (LV) fish. To produce a line of LV offspring, they were allowed to spawn with each other in university research ponds. Similarly, males and females that had been caught four or more times in the study were designated High Vulnerability (HV) fish and were spawned in different ponds to produce a line of HV offspring. 

    The two distinct lines were then marked and raised in common ponds until they were big enough to be fished.

    “Controlled fishing experiments clearly showed that the HV offspring were more vulnerable to angling than the LV offspring,” said the researcher. 

    After repeating the selection process multiple times during the course of 20 years, Phillip and his research team found that with each generation the vulnerability difference between the two designated lines grew even more pronounced.

    “Most of the selection is occurring on the LV fish—that is, for the most part, the process is making that line of fish less vulnerable to angling. We actually saw only a small increase in angling vulnerability in the HV line,” Philipp said.

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 10, 2009

    Mountain Lion Survival-10

    by
    Rate 100%0%

    A new study conducted at the University of California-Davis suggests that the conventional advice of standing one’s ground when confronted by a mountain lion and trying to appear large might not always be the best tact. 

    Despite the fact that every state game and fish agency that operates in lion country recommends the opposite, the study concludes that in some instances, running might be the wisest move.

    “Immobility may be interpreted by the mountain lion as a sign that you are vulnerable prey, either because you are unaware of its presence, or because you are disabled and not capable of escaping,” said the study’s lead author, psychology professor Richard Coss, who the university describes as an expert on the evolution of predator-prey relationships.

    The review of 110 years of mountain lion attacks looked at personal accounts, news articles and wildlife agency reports involving 185 people in the U.S. and Canada.

    One study collaborator is well-known hunting and outdoor writer Kathy Etling, author of the 2004 book, Cougar Attacks: Encounters of the Worst Kind. E. Lee Fitzhugh, a wildlife enhancement specialist with the UC Davis Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology also served as a contributor.

    “The Effects of Human Age, Group Composition, and Behavior on the Likelihood of Being Injured by Attacking Pumas,” is published in the current issue (volume 22, issue 1) of the quarterly journal Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals.

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 9, 2009

    Road Hazard-11

    by
    Rate 100%0%

    Considering the economic turmoil faced by many newspapers these days, I guess we shouldn’t expect newspaper reporters and their editors in urban parts of New Jersey to be expert ornithologists when it comes to bird identification.

    That’s asking way too much.

    But you’d think that maybe, just maybe, someone covering the story that appeared in several New Jersey and New York news sources during the weekend would have looked at the photograph accompanying their reports and recognized that the big bird that crashed through the window of a minivan on Route 80 in Parsippany one morning last week was not a turkey vulture—it was a wild turkey.

    Jorge Hurtado and his wife were engaged in their morning commute when the big fowl crashed through their windshield, showering Mrs. Hurtado with glass as it hurtled past her, landing in the back seat, where it soon succumbed to its injuries.

    Papers including the Morris County Daily Record, Newark Star Ledger, Gannett New Jersey and New York’s Newsday all identified the bird as a vulture, as did NJ State Trooper Brian Miller, who investigated the accident.

    Just have a look at the photo snapped by Mr. Hurtado at the scene. Ever seen a buzzard with legs (and spurs) like that?

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 7, 2009

    Jaws of the Mississippi-10

    by
    Rate 50%50%

     

    There aren’t many movies that depict the finer points of angling, the craft and skill associated with catching fish and the overall pleasure of all things piscatorial.

    But leave it to The Newshound to bring Outdoor Life readers the latest in angling entertainment—news about a provocative new fishing movie you’re not going to find playing at your local theatre or Cineplex 4. No sirree! This puppy is destined to make a beeline straight to DVD!

    I can't even begin to do justice to the screenplay and plot of “Jaws of the Mississippi,” so here’s the synopsis provided by the movie’s producer, Active Entertainment (based in the American cinematic hotbed of creativity, Lafayette, Louisiana):

    A massive hurricane devastates the Gulf of Mexico, with it a US government’s top-secret anti-bioterrorism facility.  When one of its highly radioactive chemicals spills into the ocean it triggers mutations in a great white shark, enabling its adaptation to survive in fresh water. As this shark reeks (that’s the producer’s spelling, not mine) havoc on local Mississippi River towns it poses the additional risk of spreading this radioactive material and contaminating the entire freshwater system of the United States.  Local fisherman Ward and his hillbilly crew are secretly hired to hunt down this shark, and when they find it threatening a group of teenage boaters, Ward must face his troubled past to save these kids and prevent further catastrophe.

    Something tells me the riveting movie dialogue contains a line like: “We’re gonna need a bigger jonboat!”

     

     

     

    [ Read Full Post ]
  • April 2, 2009

    Death By Baitfish-7

    by
    Rate 0%0%

    In what authorities are calling a freak accident, a Huntington Beach, Calif. fisherman choked to death on a baitfish while trying to entertain a boatful of school kids on a fishing trip Friday. 

    The death of Jeff Twaddle, 54, a deckhand on the charter boat Gale Force, was ruled accidental by the county coroner’s office. The official cause of death was “aspiration of fish.”

    According to reports, Twaddle was joking with the 20 elementary school children who joined him onboard for an outing that departed from the Rainbow Marina near the Port of Long Beach.

    The Orange County Register reports today that the joke quickly turned fatal when Twaddle began choking, lost consciousness, and was unresponsive. Lifeguards attempted to revive the longtime fisherman while en-route to land, where Long Beach paramedics were waiting.

    Long Beach fire battalion Chief Frank Hayes said Twaddle was “trying to be lighthearted and make students laugh when he put the fish in his mouth.”

    [ Read Full Post ]