Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Making Sense of the World-Record Whitetail

September 19, 2012
Making Sense of the World-Record Whitetail - 4

The whitetail deer world is holding its collective breath as official scorers for the Boone and Crockett Club gather this weekend in Missoula, Montana, to finally put a tape measure to what could be the next world-record buck.

Panel scoring for Johnny King’s remarkable Wisconsin whitetail, killed in 2006, will be held Saturday, Sept. 22, and we’ll provide updates as we know them over the weekend.

At issue—and the detail that could allow the King Buck to topple Milo Hanson’s legendary Saskatchewan buck as the world-record whitetail—is whether the King Buck should be scored as a typical or a non-typical rack. Does its right G3 point express characteristics of a typical point or a non-typical point? The difference, as Tony Hansen explains, could result in a swing of more than 30 inches of measurement.

Because the definition of this single dubious point essentially comes down to an interpretation, the B&C Club is convening a panel of official scorers to collectively measure the rack. Will we be crowning a new world-record whitetail by next week? Stay tuned.

Did Our Love Affair With Symmetry Doom the King Buck?

Milo Hanson’s remarkable Saskatchewan buck, a clean 6x6, scores 213 5⁄8. It is the reigning world-record typical whitetail. But should that title be handed to the King Buck?

Killed by Johnny King in Wisconsin in 2006, this whitetail appears to be a massive, long-tined 6x6 typical. No drop tines. No stickers, flyers, or trash. Scored as a typical, the buck reportedly could score 215, easily surpassing Hanson’s all-time mark.

But it’s not a typical—at least not according to Boone and Crockett’s scoring system. 

Why? Because the buck’s right G3 is classified as sharing a common base with the G2, it is defined as an abnormal point. That means the left G3 does not match the right, and thus the buck must be scored as a typical 5x5 and penalized nearly 35 inches in antler mass. Pulled from record-book consideration by its owners, the King Buck’s unofficial B&C typical score is around 180 inches.

Read more about Milo Hanson's record buck, or a bit more about the history of scoring bucks.

Top left: King Buck; Bottom Right: Hanson's buck

Comments (4)

Top Rated
All Comments
from schmakenzie wrote 1 year 29 weeks ago

Tony,

deeranddeerhunting.com has a featured article talking about the "King" buck. It states this at the end of the article.

"Like the drunk guy who shows up at bar time and spills a drink on the bartender — and then blames the bartender for serving him — Field & Stream blasted D&DH for “kicking off this ruckus” by publishing Dobie’s article in 2011. F&S also reports they will have “breaking news” on the scoring session tomorrow."

Another conspiracy?

Who knows.

What do they mean by this Tony?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 1 year 29 weeks ago

I admire a nice rack as much as the next guy, but I've gotta admit, I'll get excited about the world record when I think it's in the back of my truck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from pfettig77 wrote 1 year 30 weeks ago

I think it's crazy that rack size comes down to human judgement/opinion. I think scoring a buck should be less like scoring figure skating (usig oft. fallible judgment) and more like scoring the 100 meter dash (using scientific instruments). Racks should be measured by volume. It's weird to have a pannel of scorers poking around and pointing things out to decide if we should consider this the biggest buck of all time or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from GrandView wrote 1 year 30 weeks ago

"Because the buck’s right G3 is classified as sharing a common base with the G2, it is defined as an abnormal point."

Oh please. After years of discussion, and at least 3 Boone & Crockett releases.......you still site a "common base". B&C has specifically stated the ruling was not common base......which is a "normal" rather than "abnormal" ruling anyway.

The point in question was ruled to be an abnormal inside offset point.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

from pfettig77 wrote 1 year 30 weeks ago

I think it's crazy that rack size comes down to human judgement/opinion. I think scoring a buck should be less like scoring figure skating (usig oft. fallible judgment) and more like scoring the 100 meter dash (using scientific instruments). Racks should be measured by volume. It's weird to have a pannel of scorers poking around and pointing things out to decide if we should consider this the biggest buck of all time or not.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from GrandView wrote 1 year 30 weeks ago

"Because the buck’s right G3 is classified as sharing a common base with the G2, it is defined as an abnormal point."

Oh please. After years of discussion, and at least 3 Boone & Crockett releases.......you still site a "common base". B&C has specifically stated the ruling was not common base......which is a "normal" rather than "abnormal" ruling anyway.

The point in question was ruled to be an abnormal inside offset point.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 1 year 29 weeks ago

I admire a nice rack as much as the next guy, but I've gotta admit, I'll get excited about the world record when I think it's in the back of my truck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from schmakenzie wrote 1 year 29 weeks ago

Tony,

deeranddeerhunting.com has a featured article talking about the "King" buck. It states this at the end of the article.

"Like the drunk guy who shows up at bar time and spills a drink on the bartender — and then blames the bartender for serving him — Field & Stream blasted D&DH for “kicking off this ruckus” by publishing Dobie’s article in 2011. F&S also reports they will have “breaking news” on the scoring session tomorrow."

Another conspiracy?

Who knows.

What do they mean by this Tony?

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

bmxbiz