Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Anti-Gun Protestors Target Starbucks for Upholding the Second Amendment

Syndicate

Syndicate content
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Shots Recent Posts

Categories

Recent Comments

Archives

The Gun Shots
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 30, 2012
Anti-Gun Protestors Target Starbucks for Upholding the Second Amendment - 17

A nationwide boycott of Starbucks stores and its products will be launched on Valentine's Day to eliminate "the risk of guns in public places and ultimately to bring sane gun laws to the U.S."

This boycott is being called by the National Gun Victim's Action Council (NGAC), a network of 14 million gun victims, and is targeting Starbucks because it allows guns and assault weapons to be openly carried in its stores in 43 states, and concealed and carried in its stores in 49 states.

 

"Starbucks has the legal right to ban guns but despite having been petitioned by thousands, asked at a shareholder meeting, and a direct appeal made to their Board, Starbucks clings to this policy that puts millions of Americans at risk every day and encourages the spread of guns being carried in public," said NGAC CEO Elliot Fineman in a Jan. 23 press release circulated by the group.

Of course, such reasoning is sheer idiocy, said Seattle Guns Rights Examiner Dave Workman in a Jan. 23 Examiner.com column.

"Starbucks’ sin is that the coffee giant caters to everybody, including legally-armed citizens, whether they carry openly or concealed," Workman wrote. "Starbucks made it plain in 2010 when the Brady Campaign, assisted locally by Washington CeaseFire, that it abides by local state laws and does not discriminate against a certain class of customers. Starbucks has the legal right to serve any customer it pleases, including someone exercising his or her right to bear arms. Fineman evidently doesn’t grasp that."

For more, go to:

Starbucks' "Pro-Gun" Policy Prompts Gun Victims' Advocate Group to Launch Nationwide Boycott on Valentine's Day 2012

More DOJ embarrassment; more Starbucks stupidity; Oly hearings re-scheduled

Call for Boycott of Starbucks on Valentine's Day Over Gun Policy

Starbucks boycott: National Gun Victim's Council boycotts Starbucks on Feb 14

Comments (17)

Top Rated
All Comments
from precious821 wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

All legal gun owning AMERICANS; LETS GET TOGETHER ON V-DAY. OPEN CARRY YOUR WEAPON, BE IT A PISTOL, RIFLE, OR SHOTTY. CHECK YOU LOCAL LAWS FOR HOW TO CARRY.

***PLEASE SEND TO YOU E-MAIL CONTACS, FACEBOOK, TWITTER etc.***
PLEASE DO IT PEACEFULLY

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cbarn wrote 14 weeks 5 days ago

Do not get me wrong the last thing I want to see is someone having to shoot someone in order to protect themselves. It is odd how the anti gun people look at things. A woman raped and strangled but her own pantyhose is more ethical that a woman explaining to the police how her attacker got the three bullet holes in his chest.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

Not a big coffee drinker but I'm now planning on starting. At Starbucks.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Barry Hirsh wrote 15 weeks 19 hours ago

This is typical of meddlesome, in-your-face progressives that want their statist philosophy to control everybody's lifestyles and behavior.

As we should learn from history, they won't take "No." for an answer, and simply refuse to go away and leave people alone.

This country was built on the premise and etiquette that "You leave me alone, and I'll leave you alone." Where most problems originate is when people diverge from this tenet, and seek to force their will on others.

What they really need is beat up real bad, but unfortunately, that is illegal. Pity. It would solve the problems immediately, on the spot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tritonrider wrote 15 weeks 19 hours ago

Sent Starbucks a note of support this morning and have already received a great response from them.
They'd love to hear from all of us since they are being bombarded by the other side.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tritonrider wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Folks we all need to contact Starbucks and let them know that we support them and thank them. They are going to be buried in E-mail from these activists, and need to hear from us.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vince Hathaway wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Jayson has a good point. The city with the most extreme gun control is Washington DC which in 2010 had twenty seven times more murders than the larger city of El Paso, Texas.
Regardless of how one feels about guns twenty seven times more murders is a lot! Both cities have large minority populations so that does not explain the difference. What separates the two is the fact that in Texas any responsible adult may carry a concealed handgun and Texas has a death penalty. Gun bans ironically kill people.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 6phunter wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I don't mind people that have different opinions than my own,however I do take offence when they interfere with my choices and think they know whats better for me.If these people don't like starbucks stance, then they should take thier buisness elsewhere.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bert Nelson wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Not a big fan of their coffee but they would get my business anyway. Thanks for standing tall Starbucks!!!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 1dwarfshort wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

This is the same as protesting greyhound bus lines for letting women on them. I think this is a gift. If used correctly, this can trivialize these knuckleheads to bankruptcy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from A Wild Beast at... wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I think that it is time that we spend some money at Starbucks and other businesses that uphold the second ammendment.

Please, read my blog at http://awildbeastatheart.blogspot.com

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from nearlynormalnorman wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Starbucks may also have the good sense to understand that it is probably safer for everyone if a responsible person brings his gun into the shop as opposed to leaving it in the vehicle where it might be stolen by an incompetent moron.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from JM wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Simple solution to the problem: Use the Drive-thru or find a new place to buy your coffee if you do not like that people can carry a firearm inside starbucks.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I'm more puzzled by the logic that Starbucks enacting a policy would change people's habits and views on firearm ownership. I don't see myself being faced with a Starbucks ban thinking "You know... I plan on carrying while in the city today, but damn I'll be missing out on some fine coffee."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jayson Cooper wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago
from Stuart Perkins wrote 15 weeks 2 days ago

A lot of folks just don't get it. The criminal crazy cares neither about business policy nor laws and will bring and use a gun to destroy the innocent if and when he feels like it. The more armed sane people that there are at any given location, the less damage the criminal crazy will do before being stopped, if he even decides it is worth it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ranny Lane wrote 15 weeks 2 days ago

Starbucks should tell them idiots that guns don't kill, people do...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

from A Wild Beast at... wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I think that it is time that we spend some money at Starbucks and other businesses that uphold the second ammendment.

Please, read my blog at http://awildbeastatheart.blogspot.com

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Stuart Perkins wrote 15 weeks 2 days ago

A lot of folks just don't get it. The criminal crazy cares neither about business policy nor laws and will bring and use a gun to destroy the innocent if and when he feels like it. The more armed sane people that there are at any given location, the less damage the criminal crazy will do before being stopped, if he even decides it is worth it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vince Hathaway wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Jayson has a good point. The city with the most extreme gun control is Washington DC which in 2010 had twenty seven times more murders than the larger city of El Paso, Texas.
Regardless of how one feels about guns twenty seven times more murders is a lot! Both cities have large minority populations so that does not explain the difference. What separates the two is the fact that in Texas any responsible adult may carry a concealed handgun and Texas has a death penalty. Gun bans ironically kill people.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jayson Cooper wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago
from jcarlin wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I'm more puzzled by the logic that Starbucks enacting a policy would change people's habits and views on firearm ownership. I don't see myself being faced with a Starbucks ban thinking "You know... I plan on carrying while in the city today, but damn I'll be missing out on some fine coffee."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from nearlynormalnorman wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Starbucks may also have the good sense to understand that it is probably safer for everyone if a responsible person brings his gun into the shop as opposed to leaving it in the vehicle where it might be stolen by an incompetent moron.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 6phunter wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

I don't mind people that have different opinions than my own,however I do take offence when they interfere with my choices and think they know whats better for me.If these people don't like starbucks stance, then they should take thier buisness elsewhere.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ranny Lane wrote 15 weeks 2 days ago

Starbucks should tell them idiots that guns don't kill, people do...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JM wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Simple solution to the problem: Use the Drive-thru or find a new place to buy your coffee if you do not like that people can carry a firearm inside starbucks.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cbarn wrote 14 weeks 5 days ago

Do not get me wrong the last thing I want to see is someone having to shoot someone in order to protect themselves. It is odd how the anti gun people look at things. A woman raped and strangled but her own pantyhose is more ethical that a woman explaining to the police how her attacker got the three bullet holes in his chest.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from precious821 wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

All legal gun owning AMERICANS; LETS GET TOGETHER ON V-DAY. OPEN CARRY YOUR WEAPON, BE IT A PISTOL, RIFLE, OR SHOTTY. CHECK YOU LOCAL LAWS FOR HOW TO CARRY.

***PLEASE SEND TO YOU E-MAIL CONTACS, FACEBOOK, TWITTER etc.***
PLEASE DO IT PEACEFULLY

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 1dwarfshort wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

This is the same as protesting greyhound bus lines for letting women on them. I think this is a gift. If used correctly, this can trivialize these knuckleheads to bankruptcy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tritonrider wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Folks we all need to contact Starbucks and let them know that we support them and thank them. They are going to be buried in E-mail from these activists, and need to hear from us.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tritonrider wrote 15 weeks 19 hours ago

Sent Starbucks a note of support this morning and have already received a great response from them.
They'd love to hear from all of us since they are being bombarded by the other side.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Barry Hirsh wrote 15 weeks 19 hours ago

This is typical of meddlesome, in-your-face progressives that want their statist philosophy to control everybody's lifestyles and behavior.

As we should learn from history, they won't take "No." for an answer, and simply refuse to go away and leave people alone.

This country was built on the premise and etiquette that "You leave me alone, and I'll leave you alone." Where most problems originate is when people diverge from this tenet, and seek to force their will on others.

What they really need is beat up real bad, but unfortunately, that is illegal. Pity. It would solve the problems immediately, on the spot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

Not a big coffee drinker but I'm now planning on starting. At Starbucks.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bert Nelson wrote 15 weeks 1 day ago

Not a big fan of their coffee but they would get my business anyway. Thanks for standing tall Starbucks!!!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)