Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Nevada Governor Vetoes Gun Bill Despite Bloomberg's Threats

Syndicate

Syndicate content
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!

The Gun Shots Recent Posts

Categories

Recent Comments

Archives

The Gun Shots
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

June 14, 2013
Nevada Governor Vetoes Gun Bill Despite Bloomberg's Threats - 3

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval on June 13 vetoed a bill requiring background checks for gun sales between private parties, telling the Las Vegas Sun that it “imposes unreasonable burdens and harsh penalties upon law-abiding Nevadans, while doing little to prevent criminals from unlawfully obtaining firearms.”

Sandoval said the bill had a number of worthy elements, including prohibiting the possession of guns by anyone judged mentally ill. He also applauded a section that required courts to speed up reporting of mental health adjudications.
   
Sandoval made no secret that he would veto any bill mandating background checks for private firearms transactions, but in doing so, he enflamed the wrath of anti-gun groups that had lobbied for its passage, including Mayors Against Illegal Guns, led by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, which has pledged to finance election campaigns against officials such as Sandoval.
   
While proponents often cited results from a poll showing 86 percent of Nevadans favor background checks for private party gun sales, Sandoval's office said from June 6 through June 12 it received 152,995 calls opposing the gun bill and 27,465 in favor.
   
Sandoval also quoted from a letter from the Nevada Sheriffs’ and Chiefs’ Association that said mandatory background checks “on private sales place an unreasonable burden on law-abiding citizens, with the potential to make them criminals.”
   
“It would be unenforceable by law enforcement. It is our opinion this bill would do little to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals,” the NSCA letter stated.
   
Citing Sandoval's veto, Bloomberg called upon Democratic donors in New York to withdraw their financial support from any elected official who opposes gun control legislation, including four key Democrats whose re-election next year could determine if the party retains control of the Senate.
   
According to the New York Times, the national Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised $30.4 million from New York donors in 2012, more than in any other state.
   
The four Democratic senators who sided with Republicans in defeating the Manchin-Toomey compromise background check bill -- Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota -- have raised more than $2.2 million from New York donors.
   
Bloomberg has already spent $350,000 on ads targeting Pryor. Begich, who also faces re-election in 2014, told the New York Times that Alaskans are not going to be very receptive to a Bloomberg-led attack.
   
“In Alaska, having a New York mayor tell us what to do? The guy who wants to ban Big Gulps?” Begich asked. “If anything, it might help me.”
   
For more, go to:
-- Governor vetoes gun bill, says it would erode rights
-- NV governor snubs NYC mayor’s threats, vetoes anti-gun bill
-- Sandoval vetoes gun control bill
-- Why Washington gun control initiative will get national attention
-- Bloomberg Asks Donors to Withhold Gifts Over Gun Votes
-- NY targets donations in gun-control push
-- Bloomberg pressures donors over gun control votes

Comments (3)

Top Rated
All Comments
from brunsk42 wrote 1 year 5 weeks ago

I think more elected officals should have this much common sence, you don't pass bills just to pass them without a solution to the problem. The problem is not law abiding citizens whom they wish to crimanalize for no good reason except feel good legislation.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bioguy001 wrote 1 year 5 weeks ago

HunterDan - There aren't many people in NY that are all that fond of him either. NYC folks live in a different reality than the rest of NY.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from HunterDan wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

Thank God not too many people outside of New York listen to that windbag Bloomberg.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

from HunterDan wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

Thank God not too many people outside of New York listen to that windbag Bloomberg.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bioguy001 wrote 1 year 5 weeks ago

HunterDan - There aren't many people in NY that are all that fond of him either. NYC folks live in a different reality than the rest of NY.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from brunsk42 wrote 1 year 5 weeks ago

I think more elected officals should have this much common sence, you don't pass bills just to pass them without a solution to the problem. The problem is not law abiding citizens whom they wish to crimanalize for no good reason except feel good legislation.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)