Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Senator Feinstein's Semi-Auto Gun Ban Bill Unlikely to Pass

Syndicate

Syndicate content
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!

The Gun Shots Recent Posts

Categories

Recent Comments

Archives

The Gun Shots
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 28, 2013
Senator Feinstein's Semi-Auto Gun Ban Bill Unlikely to Pass - 3

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) formally introduced her revived semi-automatic firearms ban "on steroids" Thursday (Jan. 24), which proposes to ban the “sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing" of more than 100 specifically named firearms, including semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns that accept detachable and fixed magazines of more than 10 rounds and have one or more "military characteristics."
               
According to an analysis by WND.com on Jan. 23, while Feinstein claims her "Assault Weapons Ban of 2013" will protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting, or "grandfathering," already legally owned firearms and “disabled” weapons, her bill "would demand that the owners be investigated, photographed and fingerprinted; the type and serial number of the weapon be registered and local law enforcement certify that it is legal."
               
A Washington Examiner report notes that Feinstein’s bill would also impose a $200 tax every time a "grandfathered" or "exempt" firearm is registered or transferred, essentially taxing semiautomatic firearms owners "for weapons they already have purchased and on which they already have paid taxes."
               
Feinstein introduced the bill in Washington, D.C., flanked by mayors, law enforcement officials, gun violence victims and Connecticut senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, as well as Rep. Elizabeth Esty, whose district includes Newtown, Conn., scene of the Dec. 14 school shootings that prompted a national gun control discussion.
               
Esty is expected to co-sponsor the House version of Feinstein's bill that will be introduced there by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), a leading gun-control advocate.
               
Feinstein's bill joins other gun-control measures introduced this week, including Sen. Frank Lautenberg's (D-N.J.) proposal to require background checks for all firearms purchases, such as those conducted by private individuals and at gun shows, and a bill co-sponsored by Sens. Patrick Leahy, (D-Vt.) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) that would beef-up the federal law prohibiting straw purchases of guns, transactions in which someone buys a gun for someone else who is barred from getting one on their own.
               
While there appears to be broad support for tightening background checks and prohibiting straw purchases, Feinstein's proposed semi-automatic firearms ban faces an uphill battle, according to Brian Montopoli of CBS News on Jan. 24.
               
"There is little reason to believe that the measure could pass the GOP-led House -- and it may well not even be able to get through the Democrat-led Senate," Montopoli wrote.
               
Democrats control 55 out 100 Senate votes. Ban supporters would need all of those votes, plus five GOP votes, to pass the bill.
               
"That's a tall order: At least five Senate Democrats have declined to take a position on (gun-control legislation) and there is only one Republican in the Senate -- Mark Kirk of Illinois -- who supports an assault weapons ban," Montopoli writes.
               
In fact, after initially saying he wouldn't even allow a vote on the ban because it would not pass the GOP-led House, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) indicated that he may allow a vote, Montopoli wrote, "though he made clear that he did not expect the measure to pass."
               
For more, go to:
-- Major gun legislation poised to roll out
               
-- Feinstein revives assault-weapons ban
               
-- Gun control bill faces long odds in Congress
               
-- Lawmakers to unveil new assault weapons ban
               
-- Conn. senators to propose assault weapons ban
               
-- McCarthy Presses Gun-Magazine Limits as Weapons Ban Dims
               
-- A look back at gun control history
               
-- Letter: Feinstein has reason for her positions on guns
               
-- GUN CONTROL LAWS PROPOSED AT STATE AND NATIONAL LEVELS
               
-- IT'S ON! FEINSTEIN UNVEILING GUN-GRAB PLAN
               
-- 5 things you should know about 'assault weapons'
               
-- The Antigun Movement's Bridge Too Far

Comments (3)

Top Rated
All Comments
from HunterDan wrote 1 year 10 weeks ago

Isn't going to matter to this New Yorker, since our idiot governor already succeeded in banning all that. I just hope non-New York residents don't have it happen to them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DSMbirddog wrote 1 year 11 weeks ago

It seems to me that there are some common sense things they can do to help this situation but Feinstein's bill is not one of them. Besides banning all those firearms, the restrictions and requirements also written are aimed at curtailing gun ownership not making America any safer.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntfishtrap wrote 1 year 11 weeks ago

What is it about Illinois, even their self-professed Republican politicians seem awfully liberal most of the time.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

from huntfishtrap wrote 1 year 11 weeks ago

What is it about Illinois, even their self-professed Republican politicians seem awfully liberal most of the time.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DSMbirddog wrote 1 year 11 weeks ago

It seems to me that there are some common sense things they can do to help this situation but Feinstein's bill is not one of them. Besides banning all those firearms, the restrictions and requirements also written are aimed at curtailing gun ownership not making America any safer.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from HunterDan wrote 1 year 10 weeks ago

Isn't going to matter to this New Yorker, since our idiot governor already succeeded in banning all that. I just hope non-New York residents don't have it happen to them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)