Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Hunting Will Live Forever!

Why Hunting Will Live Forever!

Instead of pondering the doom and gloom of the bad economy, consider these 10 reasons why our hunting heritage is safe.
why_hunt_1

Comments (37)

Top Rated
All Comments
from vicentee wrote 3 years 39 weeks ago

In regards to contract the obligee can pay the premium, since it is protection for the obligee not the principal, the obligee has an insurable interest. The obligee is investing or taken a insurance policy out for their business project.license bonds

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigwaterfowler wrote 4 years 31 weeks ago

# 2 and # 10 r great pics

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from elk_mountain wrote 4 years 46 weeks ago

really makes you think about tommorow

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DJP66 wrote 4 years 46 weeks ago

#3 isn't exactly true either, while it maybe true that through the cost of licenses that hunters and fishermen are the largest contributors towards involuntary payments to conservation. Hikers speaking from first hand experience contribute money every year, as well as time and effort towards land conservation and reuse, including trail maintenance that becomes game trails as well as easy access for hunters. This is through club and organizations, as well as use fees. This happens year round, but we won't argue on the numbers because I haven't looked up any stats. If you want to point out something, make the point of the way the opponents are joining the state fish and game boards and using the guise of conservation to eliminate hunting and fishing grounds that the license is helping fund.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Murray wrote 5 years 4 days ago

#9 makes no sense. Urban sprawl destroys habitat, where will urban sprawl end? It is not our saviour, but our enemy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 2 weeks ago

The cost figure in the previous post was 11 cents per pound.

The "Dear Heart Soup" name came about because I earned my future wife's affections by feeding her soup made from a deer's heart when she had a stomach problem related to a mal-functioning gall blatter and could only digest low-fat foods.

For you guys out there, the way to a woman's heart is through the stomach.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 2 weeks ago

The meat from the last road kill that I processed yielded about 70 precent of the meat for human consumption that was packaged as ground meat and muscle masses for steaks and roasts, the heart (for Dear Heart Soup), boiled bloodshot meat and bonesfor my dogs. The cost, including energy and fuel was l1 cents per pound. For more info. see my web site hoveysmith.com and blog hoveysmith.wordpress.net. How to do this will be in my book, Backyard Deer Hunting: Converting deer to dinner for pennies per pound.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 6 weeks ago

Road-killed deer were part of my motivation for writing "Backyard Deer Hunting:Converting deer to dinner for pennies per pound" which will be published by AuthorHouse later this Summer. This book has chapters that will teach first-time hunters how to legally find, hunt and kill deer and other game with recipes for putting them on the table. There is even a chapter, The road-kill cafe, which tells how to safely salvage road kills. See my blog, Backyard Deer Hunting, for details.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from HILAWZ45 wrote 5 years 6 weeks ago

How much like Europe we are becoming,we have begun to make one of our favorite pastimes and inheritances out of the reach of the avere man. We no longer teach others in schools about our role in the grand scheme of acting as a major part of the food chain and our role in passing on this great heritage. I truly hope hunting is forever...but alas..I think it will shrink with time..more and more.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bo wrote 5 years 9 weeks ago

Mahigir, Complacency is the reason hunting is at risk. To ignore the culture war is to pretend that it is not related to what we as hunters do. We are under assault from a variety of points all of which are trying to fundamentally change who we are as a nation.
In 1943, the number of deer hunter decreased by one half due to a movie called "Bambi" That is just one attack on hunters. If we surrender ourselves to political correctness is the area of the First Amendment, the Second will go even faster. This is all related, if that makes you uncomfortable and don't want to bring it up, you have already surrendered and given up on what makes most of us what we are.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fishingfreak wrote 5 years 13 weeks ago

I believe that hunting is too deeply rooted in the hearts and minds of many Americans to be easily pulled from the people who love it so much, but must disagree with what Jbenjimac said about guns:

"If there is no need for hunters what do we need guns for?"

Guns are not only used for hunting.

1) They are used for protection, whether it is for police stopping a criminal, or someone protecting their home and family

2) They are used for the enjoyment of shooting. There has been many a day when my dad and I go to our local range and shoot, just for the fun of it, as many people have with their fathers, grandfathers, or any other family member for a long, long time.

3) Some also hold a certain sentimental value, such as Great-Grandfathers pistol from when he was in WWII, Grandfathers first .22, or a first deer rifle, that would make any such loss hard on our conscience, at least in my family.

4) They are too necessary for the freedom of the people of These United States of America. Would the Revolutionary war have been possible if the British had taken away the Colonies guns? Furthermore, all of the gun owners I know would never give up their guns even IF hunting was out of the picture.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mahigir wrote 5 years 14 weeks ago

Dear Bo, I agree that attempts at banning hunting are wrong, and I am sure, at least in Minnesota that will never happen, it is too important as a culutral and recreational activity for many differnt people. I would also like to kindly request that you don't use this forum to gripe about unrelated issues such as school prayer. You have a point in defending student's rights to religous expression (remeber that means Muslim prayer groups too) but this is not the place to do it. Lets keep things about hunting and fishing and leavr the culture wars for somewhere else.

-5 Good Comment? | | Report
from 6phunter wrote 5 years 16 weeks ago

BRIAN LYNN NEEDS TO PAY A BIT MORE ATTENTION TO WHAT SOME OF THESE SPEAKERS HAVE SAID . O f the ten reasons only no.1 and 10 hold much water ,starting with JOHN J and BO 'S strong sentiment well spoken does the truth lie, Whenever we as a whole become complacent and unwary shall we surely drop as the buck to the anti's patient arrow ,

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bo wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It would be a devastating blow to our heritage as Americans if hunting were to be outlawed. But I remember when people never thought prayer in a public setting would be an issue.
This last week in Lexington, KY, I believe, students were gathered in a lunch area to pray for a student whose mother had been killed in an accident. School officials told the children to stop and when the did not cease and desist, these school officials called the cops to get them to stop praying, something the Supreme Court has recently said was legal. There was no intent to have the students arrested of course, just to have law enforcement there for the sake of the children just in case any unwanted or unruly behavior ensued.
That is a devastating blow to our heritage. There are many other people, who have only their own agenda as the thrust of their existence, and I'm afraid the good of the general populace does not play into any of their plans. Most of what is important to them is control. Global warming proponents want you to change. Even though those people violate their own plan for YOU. AlGore's home wastes more energy than more than 20 American households and his monthly electric bill is more than mine is in 2 years.
It's all about how they can control others. If they decide hunting is wrong, they will try to stamp it out. they don't care about how it will affect our environment or anything else, just their own way. They couch their word to evoke feelings, not thought. That is why it's been so easy for them to dupe so many people who can't think for themselves only FEEL.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Colorado Samurai wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It does seem to get more expensive, but what about going to state parks (where allowed) and National Forests? Are those out?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mariner wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

Urban sprawl is clearly the nemesis of hunters. While the silver lining to it is that it makes for sketchy conflicts b/t humans and wildlife, wildlife is always the long-term loser. Hunters may enjoy a more successful season, but it is spent in a tree stand overlooking a soccer field adjacent to a mall rather than an actual sustainable setting that would teach hunting habits that would actually e able to be passed on to another generation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jbenjimac wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

If there is no need for hunters what do we need guns for?

-4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jbenjimac wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

Why do you think they introduced Wolves and are protecting them? They can remove the need for hunters right out of the equasion. They are decimating Elk and Deer population. Despite what the government says. It's only a matter of time before they start shopping on the food chain and our children are on it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DonkeySlapper wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It all comes down to #10. Do we leave the future of hunting up to state bureaucrats and $10,000 trophy hunts, or try to build on a great tradition. In 5 years my son will be old enough to hunt (in PA) and I'm ambivalent. No birds, no hunting on Sunday, no space and lot's of rules. About the only wild hunting worth a dime is bow season for deer. I hope it's different where you all live.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from winterhawk wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

In the Mid-west, at least, the phasing out of CRP will have quite an impact on all wildlife populations and hunting opportunities in the next few years. There is not enough quality public land to support the current demand. When the blue collar hunters lose interest, then groups like NRA,DU, SCI, etc will lose the support they need to hold off the anti's.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I'm a Hunter Ed Instructor in Missouri, and we do have to continue to fight anti-hunting pressures nation-wide. Especially now that we have a Democratic party in control of the county, we'll likely see more movement against hunting and gun ownership. In Missouri,we have one of the best and fastest growing hunting communities of those new to hunting and the largest group are women. Take your kids and grandkids outside, get them involved and off of the computer, television and ipods.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from handicapped hunter wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

i dont get how people complain about hitting deer with there cars yet wont let you thin the herd on there land if you truly want to exceed in deer management let hunters hunt privite lands otherwise deer will stay there and never be managed think of it like this if you want to keep paying high insurence rates keep your land un huntable till then dont complain about the deer hitting your car our truck!!!!!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from SCHuntman wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

In SC the insurance companies are the main reason we have such a long season with higher limits. They spend lots of time and money to try to keep deer off the roads. I'm more than happy to help!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JBUG308 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Most timber companies that I've encountered could care less if they lease the land or not. The land is there to generate revenue through timber. I know of one that is getting tested for phosphate mining and if it turns out that way, forget the timber. And forget the hunting leases that are currently there. Right now most timber companies keep their $$ amount per acre with the average rate. And if they find that quality bucks are being taken, the rate can go up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Aaron1991 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

they can outlaw in all they want but i aint gonna stop itll be just like prohabition, its gonna be to hgard 2 inforce and people will do it wether the law likes it or not

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from sebesta32 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The price of hunting started to rise when it stopped being a hobby and became a business. More and more people wanted to make their living selling the wildlife on their property. Therefore, as a group, they started slowly raising the prices to hunt to make their ends meet. Instead of hunting being a supplement to their income, it became their main source. When the demand increased, more and more people entered the "business". I can see why, its better than working for someone and look how much fun it is.
Hunting will take a hit during this recession and hopefully prices will return to normal. Does it seem normal to pay $10,000-15,000 to shoot a deer?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Judy P wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

John J is right. The cost for a resident deer season has already gotten outrages. With the cost for my husband, two sons, and myself its getting close to unaffordable now. Then what will animal rights people do when they are over run by deer raccoon & coyote just to name a few? They wont be so quick to say don't shoot then.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Snake69 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I'm inclined to agree with John J. For the last 20 years I've watched as more southern land is gobbled up by big timber companies or groups of wealthy individuals. The timber companies then lease to those who can afford to pay increasing costs of the lease. A few timber companies make an effort to keep cost per acre to a minimum, but others cater to the highest bidder. That's their right in a free enterprise country, but where does that leave the "average" hunter, struggling to raise a family while trying to pass the tradition of our sport down to his children. I wish someone smarter than I could come up with a way to make it more attractive to the high $$ companies to offer their land at reasonable rates! If our kids are forced to stop hunting, the sport will die in areas of our country. Look at declining license sales if you want proof.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from fletch14me wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I often think about the full time subsistance hunters up in Alaska. Can you imagine the government telling them that "NO" you can't hunt anymore. Of the 10 reasons I can only see that the last one has a true chance. It's up to us as sportsman to protect what we hold dear.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from winterhawk wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

John J. hit the nail on the head. Cost and a place to hunt are taking a toll in our sport every year.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from John J. wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

These 10 items are interesting for discussion except that the socialist movement now afoot cares nothing for any of those issues supported financially by sportsmen. They will figure another way to tax us IF they are really interested in conservation and habitat management.

Hunting, and then fishing soon to follow will become the sport of the socialist elite (aka communist Russia before the wall fell) and the super rich. It is almost there now with hunting tags soaring to $1000 and more and average outfitted western hunts approaching the $8000-10,000 range already.

I don't see hunting outlawed in my life time (58) but I see it getting so expensive with fees, limitations, restrictions, and outright expenses that the everyday worker won't be able to afford it.

I remember back in the 60s my dad quitting duck hunting when the federal bag limit went to 2 ducks. I'll never forget that.

+10 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bucktail wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The south shall rise one more time

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from NYBowHunter wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

As a northerner, I tip my hat to the South!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JBUG308 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The only one I truly believe is #4.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott Linden wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Why hunting MIGHT die ...

#1: Can you say "hubris?"

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Remington Metric wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

It’s nice to think that insurance companies would lobby to keep something like hunting. Remember, as sportsmen and women we can’t ever let down our guard; there are a LOT of ignorant organizations with huge budgets who would love to see hunting, fishing, and trapping as a thing of the past. Whatever your interest is as an outdoorsman support the group that represents you.

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from Yoda wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Some nice pictures

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

from John J. wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

These 10 items are interesting for discussion except that the socialist movement now afoot cares nothing for any of those issues supported financially by sportsmen. They will figure another way to tax us IF they are really interested in conservation and habitat management.

Hunting, and then fishing soon to follow will become the sport of the socialist elite (aka communist Russia before the wall fell) and the super rich. It is almost there now with hunting tags soaring to $1000 and more and average outfitted western hunts approaching the $8000-10,000 range already.

I don't see hunting outlawed in my life time (58) but I see it getting so expensive with fees, limitations, restrictions, and outright expenses that the everyday worker won't be able to afford it.

I remember back in the 60s my dad quitting duck hunting when the federal bag limit went to 2 ducks. I'll never forget that.

+10 Good Comment? | | Report
from Remington Metric wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

It’s nice to think that insurance companies would lobby to keep something like hunting. Remember, as sportsmen and women we can’t ever let down our guard; there are a LOT of ignorant organizations with huge budgets who would love to see hunting, fishing, and trapping as a thing of the past. Whatever your interest is as an outdoorsman support the group that represents you.

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from winterhawk wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

John J. hit the nail on the head. Cost and a place to hunt are taking a toll in our sport every year.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bo wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It would be a devastating blow to our heritage as Americans if hunting were to be outlawed. But I remember when people never thought prayer in a public setting would be an issue.
This last week in Lexington, KY, I believe, students were gathered in a lunch area to pray for a student whose mother had been killed in an accident. School officials told the children to stop and when the did not cease and desist, these school officials called the cops to get them to stop praying, something the Supreme Court has recently said was legal. There was no intent to have the students arrested of course, just to have law enforcement there for the sake of the children just in case any unwanted or unruly behavior ensued.
That is a devastating blow to our heritage. There are many other people, who have only their own agenda as the thrust of their existence, and I'm afraid the good of the general populace does not play into any of their plans. Most of what is important to them is control. Global warming proponents want you to change. Even though those people violate their own plan for YOU. AlGore's home wastes more energy than more than 20 American households and his monthly electric bill is more than mine is in 2 years.
It's all about how they can control others. If they decide hunting is wrong, they will try to stamp it out. they don't care about how it will affect our environment or anything else, just their own way. They couch their word to evoke feelings, not thought. That is why it's been so easy for them to dupe so many people who can't think for themselves only FEEL.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Snake69 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I'm inclined to agree with John J. For the last 20 years I've watched as more southern land is gobbled up by big timber companies or groups of wealthy individuals. The timber companies then lease to those who can afford to pay increasing costs of the lease. A few timber companies make an effort to keep cost per acre to a minimum, but others cater to the highest bidder. That's their right in a free enterprise country, but where does that leave the "average" hunter, struggling to raise a family while trying to pass the tradition of our sport down to his children. I wish someone smarter than I could come up with a way to make it more attractive to the high $$ companies to offer their land at reasonable rates! If our kids are forced to stop hunting, the sport will die in areas of our country. Look at declining license sales if you want proof.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from handicapped hunter wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

i dont get how people complain about hitting deer with there cars yet wont let you thin the herd on there land if you truly want to exceed in deer management let hunters hunt privite lands otherwise deer will stay there and never be managed think of it like this if you want to keep paying high insurence rates keep your land un huntable till then dont complain about the deer hitting your car our truck!!!!!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from 6phunter wrote 5 years 16 weeks ago

BRIAN LYNN NEEDS TO PAY A BIT MORE ATTENTION TO WHAT SOME OF THESE SPEAKERS HAVE SAID . O f the ten reasons only no.1 and 10 hold much water ,starting with JOHN J and BO 'S strong sentiment well spoken does the truth lie, Whenever we as a whole become complacent and unwary shall we surely drop as the buck to the anti's patient arrow ,

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bo wrote 5 years 9 weeks ago

Mahigir, Complacency is the reason hunting is at risk. To ignore the culture war is to pretend that it is not related to what we as hunters do. We are under assault from a variety of points all of which are trying to fundamentally change who we are as a nation.
In 1943, the number of deer hunter decreased by one half due to a movie called "Bambi" That is just one attack on hunters. If we surrender ourselves to political correctness is the area of the First Amendment, the Second will go even faster. This is all related, if that makes you uncomfortable and don't want to bring it up, you have already surrendered and given up on what makes most of us what we are.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from sebesta32 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The price of hunting started to rise when it stopped being a hobby and became a business. More and more people wanted to make their living selling the wildlife on their property. Therefore, as a group, they started slowly raising the prices to hunt to make their ends meet. Instead of hunting being a supplement to their income, it became their main source. When the demand increased, more and more people entered the "business". I can see why, its better than working for someone and look how much fun it is.
Hunting will take a hit during this recession and hopefully prices will return to normal. Does it seem normal to pay $10,000-15,000 to shoot a deer?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Aaron1991 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

they can outlaw in all they want but i aint gonna stop itll be just like prohabition, its gonna be to hgard 2 inforce and people will do it wether the law likes it or not

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from DonkeySlapper wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It all comes down to #10. Do we leave the future of hunting up to state bureaucrats and $10,000 trophy hunts, or try to build on a great tradition. In 5 years my son will be old enough to hunt (in PA) and I'm ambivalent. No birds, no hunting on Sunday, no space and lot's of rules. About the only wild hunting worth a dime is bow season for deer. I hope it's different where you all live.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from HILAWZ45 wrote 5 years 6 weeks ago

How much like Europe we are becoming,we have begun to make one of our favorite pastimes and inheritances out of the reach of the avere man. We no longer teach others in schools about our role in the grand scheme of acting as a major part of the food chain and our role in passing on this great heritage. I truly hope hunting is forever...but alas..I think it will shrink with time..more and more.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from fletch14me wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I often think about the full time subsistance hunters up in Alaska. Can you imagine the government telling them that "NO" you can't hunt anymore. Of the 10 reasons I can only see that the last one has a true chance. It's up to us as sportsman to protect what we hold dear.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Judy P wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

John J is right. The cost for a resident deer season has already gotten outrages. With the cost for my husband, two sons, and myself its getting close to unaffordable now. Then what will animal rights people do when they are over run by deer raccoon & coyote just to name a few? They wont be so quick to say don't shoot then.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

I'm a Hunter Ed Instructor in Missouri, and we do have to continue to fight anti-hunting pressures nation-wide. Especially now that we have a Democratic party in control of the county, we'll likely see more movement against hunting and gun ownership. In Missouri,we have one of the best and fastest growing hunting communities of those new to hunting and the largest group are women. Take your kids and grandkids outside, get them involved and off of the computer, television and ipods.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from winterhawk wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

In the Mid-west, at least, the phasing out of CRP will have quite an impact on all wildlife populations and hunting opportunities in the next few years. There is not enough quality public land to support the current demand. When the blue collar hunters lose interest, then groups like NRA,DU, SCI, etc will lose the support they need to hold off the anti's.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jbenjimac wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

Why do you think they introduced Wolves and are protecting them? They can remove the need for hunters right out of the equasion. They are decimating Elk and Deer population. Despite what the government says. It's only a matter of time before they start shopping on the food chain and our children are on it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mariner wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

Urban sprawl is clearly the nemesis of hunters. While the silver lining to it is that it makes for sketchy conflicts b/t humans and wildlife, wildlife is always the long-term loser. Hunters may enjoy a more successful season, but it is spent in a tree stand overlooking a soccer field adjacent to a mall rather than an actual sustainable setting that would teach hunting habits that would actually e able to be passed on to another generation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fishingfreak wrote 5 years 13 weeks ago

I believe that hunting is too deeply rooted in the hearts and minds of many Americans to be easily pulled from the people who love it so much, but must disagree with what Jbenjimac said about guns:

"If there is no need for hunters what do we need guns for?"

Guns are not only used for hunting.

1) They are used for protection, whether it is for police stopping a criminal, or someone protecting their home and family

2) They are used for the enjoyment of shooting. There has been many a day when my dad and I go to our local range and shoot, just for the fun of it, as many people have with their fathers, grandfathers, or any other family member for a long, long time.

3) Some also hold a certain sentimental value, such as Great-Grandfathers pistol from when he was in WWII, Grandfathers first .22, or a first deer rifle, that would make any such loss hard on our conscience, at least in my family.

4) They are too necessary for the freedom of the people of These United States of America. Would the Revolutionary war have been possible if the British had taken away the Colonies guns? Furthermore, all of the gun owners I know would never give up their guns even IF hunting was out of the picture.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Yoda wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Some nice pictures

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JBUG308 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The only one I truly believe is #4.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from NYBowHunter wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

As a northerner, I tip my hat to the South!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Murray wrote 5 years 4 days ago

#9 makes no sense. Urban sprawl destroys habitat, where will urban sprawl end? It is not our saviour, but our enemy.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from elk_mountain wrote 4 years 46 weeks ago

really makes you think about tommorow

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bigwaterfowler wrote 4 years 31 weeks ago

# 2 and # 10 r great pics

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JBUG308 wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Most timber companies that I've encountered could care less if they lease the land or not. The land is there to generate revenue through timber. I know of one that is getting tested for phosphate mining and if it turns out that way, forget the timber. And forget the hunting leases that are currently there. Right now most timber companies keep their $$ amount per acre with the average rate. And if they find that quality bucks are being taken, the rate can go up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SCHuntman wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

In SC the insurance companies are the main reason we have such a long season with higher limits. They spend lots of time and money to try to keep deer off the roads. I'm more than happy to help!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Colorado Samurai wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

It does seem to get more expensive, but what about going to state parks (where allowed) and National Forests? Are those out?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from DJP66 wrote 4 years 46 weeks ago

#3 isn't exactly true either, while it maybe true that through the cost of licenses that hunters and fishermen are the largest contributors towards involuntary payments to conservation. Hikers speaking from first hand experience contribute money every year, as well as time and effort towards land conservation and reuse, including trail maintenance that becomes game trails as well as easy access for hunters. This is through club and organizations, as well as use fees. This happens year round, but we won't argue on the numbers because I haven't looked up any stats. If you want to point out something, make the point of the way the opponents are joining the state fish and game boards and using the guise of conservation to eliminate hunting and fishing grounds that the license is helping fund.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from vicentee wrote 3 years 39 weeks ago

In regards to contract the obligee can pay the premium, since it is protection for the obligee not the principal, the obligee has an insurable interest. The obligee is investing or taken a insurance policy out for their business project.license bonds

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bucktail wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

The south shall rise one more time

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 6 weeks ago

Road-killed deer were part of my motivation for writing "Backyard Deer Hunting:Converting deer to dinner for pennies per pound" which will be published by AuthorHouse later this Summer. This book has chapters that will teach first-time hunters how to legally find, hunt and kill deer and other game with recipes for putting them on the table. There is even a chapter, The road-kill cafe, which tells how to safely salvage road kills. See my blog, Backyard Deer Hunting, for details.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 2 weeks ago

The meat from the last road kill that I processed yielded about 70 precent of the meat for human consumption that was packaged as ground meat and muscle masses for steaks and roasts, the heart (for Dear Heart Soup), boiled bloodshot meat and bonesfor my dogs. The cost, including energy and fuel was l1 cents per pound. For more info. see my web site hoveysmith.com and blog hoveysmith.wordpress.net. How to do this will be in my book, Backyard Deer Hunting: Converting deer to dinner for pennies per pound.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hoveysmith wrote 5 years 2 weeks ago

The cost figure in the previous post was 11 cents per pound.

The "Dear Heart Soup" name came about because I earned my future wife's affections by feeding her soup made from a deer's heart when she had a stomach problem related to a mal-functioning gall blatter and could only digest low-fat foods.

For you guys out there, the way to a woman's heart is through the stomach.

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott Linden wrote 5 years 20 weeks ago

Why hunting MIGHT die ...

#1: Can you say "hubris?"

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jbenjimac wrote 5 years 18 weeks ago

If there is no need for hunters what do we need guns for?

-4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mahigir wrote 5 years 14 weeks ago

Dear Bo, I agree that attempts at banning hunting are wrong, and I am sure, at least in Minnesota that will never happen, it is too important as a culutral and recreational activity for many differnt people. I would also like to kindly request that you don't use this forum to gripe about unrelated issues such as school prayer. You have a point in defending student's rights to religous expression (remeber that means Muslim prayer groups too) but this is not the place to do it. Lets keep things about hunting and fishing and leavr the culture wars for somewhere else.

-5 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment (200 characters or less)

1 of 10