|
|
|
Welcome to Outdoor Life
Subscribe to Outdoor Life
Free Gift with Paid Order
Recent Comments
Categories
Recent PostsArchivesSyndicate   The Gun Shots |
January 21, 2010
Mayors Against Guns..But Not Fraud, Bribes, Kickbacks... - 15
by John Haughey
What do Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D), Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (D) of Detroit and Mayor Sheila Dixon (D) of Baltimore all have in common? Yes, the (D). (D) for Democrat, disgraced, deposed. Oh, and one more thing: All are vocal, fawning apostles of New York City Mayor Michael Bamboozleberg and henchmen in his "Mayors Against Illegal Guns," that smoke-blowing artifice created to bamboozle you from your Constitutional rights under the guise of benevolent Nanny-Fascism and elitist deceit. The record—more specifically, Blagojevich's, Kilpatrick's, Dixon's records — speaks for itself. For more, go to: Mayors Against Illegal Guns Loses Yet Another Member; Also: |
|
OutdoorLife.com is part of the Bonnier Outdoor Group Network
Copyright © 2009 Bonnier Corp. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Comments (15)
Although I enjoy taking contra positions for the sake of an exercise in logical argument. I must agree in part. I would only add that this position is greatly understated.
we all know the intelect of these so called politicians i dont get why any one would listen to them.a rock is smarter than they are!
Instead of going after guns, why don't they go after criminals. Stop punishing the productive and law abiding citizens, and go after those that are a drain on society. The politicians need to wake up and do what is right for the country, not for themselves. they need a reality check. GET RID OF THE CRIMINALS, NOT THE GUNS!
Because such an endeavour wold end up at the top of the criminal food chain...their doorsteps!!!
Michael Savage is correct. Liberalism IS a Mental Disorder. Bribes/kickbacks-GOOD! Firearms/2nd Amendment-BAD! And these folks wonder why the country has turned?
ruck your comment is in bad taste!
Patrick, it would only be in bad taste to someone who is the object of the criticism. Two years ago when peopel were calling for Bush to be assassinated, did you think it was in bad taste? There was not one liberal that I heard said it was in bad taste, because the first amendment gives everyone the right to say what they think. Sound like you would censor Ruck, tell me I am mistaken, please.
bo i dont agree with anyone that wants to assassinate the president.but when dumb ass ruck insults people with a mental disorder then he insults me and i dont think he or you can when that argument with me enough said!
Patrick, your comments are more in line of poor taste than his. You are choosing to take offense at things said that you feel were directed at you. The Lamestream Media says those things about conservatives every day. According to the director of Homeland Security, I meet the criteria to be a Domestic Terrorist. You need to grow a thicker skin if you are going to run in the weeds with the big dogs.
For the record, Ruck never directed his comment specifically toward you as you did yours toward him. You owe him an apology.
well bo since you and ruck are so smart im a liberal my son has a mental disorder you and ruck are both ignorant so i suggest you and ruck need to think before you speak.and you both are the ones that need to give the apology!
I am sorry to hear that, I have a son who suffers from multiple disabilities. I understand the emotions that go along with these kinds of problems. Still the statement was not directed specifically to you. You are taking offense where it was not intended toward you.
bo i understand you very well but you and ruck need to understand that you and i need the democrats to come on here and speak freely and not get bashed every time they comment on a topic.i dont want to censor ruck or you just need to be a little more reasonable this site needs you and ruck!
I need to be more reasonable? That is good, I like that. We have the Lamestream Media who could not understand a reasonable idea if it was outlined and pointed out by God in the sky and I need to be reasonable. That's rich.
I am reasonable where many are not. I have reasoned many things out here on this site. I do not usually respond to the emotion, because I try to reason with people. I do not respond in a way that some people like because I reason not feel. I feel with my hands, I reason with my head. Because I don't usually fall for the emotional aspect of an argument, I have many people who say that I need to be reasonable, see it their way.
There again, I try to take an unemotional view of things before I post them. I think about what I am posting and do not usually resort to name calling.
bo im not asking you to change your point of view you are very reasonable im asking you to help ones like ruck see your way and not be so abrasive.
The truth ALWAYS comes out !
Post a Comment (200 characters or less)
Patrick, your comments are more in line of poor taste than his. You are choosing to take offense at things said that you feel were directed at you. The Lamestream Media says those things about conservatives every day. According to the director of Homeland Security, I meet the criteria to be a Domestic Terrorist. You need to grow a thicker skin if you are going to run in the weeds with the big dogs.
For the record, Ruck never directed his comment specifically toward you as you did yours toward him. You owe him an apology.
Instead of going after guns, why don't they go after criminals. Stop punishing the productive and law abiding citizens, and go after those that are a drain on society. The politicians need to wake up and do what is right for the country, not for themselves. they need a reality check. GET RID OF THE CRIMINALS, NOT THE GUNS!
Patrick, it would only be in bad taste to someone who is the object of the criticism. Two years ago when peopel were calling for Bush to be assassinated, did you think it was in bad taste? There was not one liberal that I heard said it was in bad taste, because the first amendment gives everyone the right to say what they think. Sound like you would censor Ruck, tell me I am mistaken, please.
Although I enjoy taking contra positions for the sake of an exercise in logical argument. I must agree in part. I would only add that this position is greatly understated.
we all know the intelect of these so called politicians i dont get why any one would listen to them.a rock is smarter than they are!
Because such an endeavour wold end up at the top of the criminal food chain...their doorsteps!!!
Michael Savage is correct. Liberalism IS a Mental Disorder. Bribes/kickbacks-GOOD! Firearms/2nd Amendment-BAD! And these folks wonder why the country has turned?
I am sorry to hear that, I have a son who suffers from multiple disabilities. I understand the emotions that go along with these kinds of problems. Still the statement was not directed specifically to you. You are taking offense where it was not intended toward you.
I need to be more reasonable? That is good, I like that. We have the Lamestream Media who could not understand a reasonable idea if it was outlined and pointed out by God in the sky and I need to be reasonable. That's rich.
I am reasonable where many are not. I have reasoned many things out here on this site. I do not usually respond to the emotion, because I try to reason with people. I do not respond in a way that some people like because I reason not feel. I feel with my hands, I reason with my head. Because I don't usually fall for the emotional aspect of an argument, I have many people who say that I need to be reasonable, see it their way.
There again, I try to take an unemotional view of things before I post them. I think about what I am posting and do not usually resort to name calling.
The truth ALWAYS comes out !
well bo since you and ruck are so smart im a liberal my son has a mental disorder you and ruck are both ignorant so i suggest you and ruck need to think before you speak.and you both are the ones that need to give the apology!
bo i understand you very well but you and ruck need to understand that you and i need the democrats to come on here and speak freely and not get bashed every time they comment on a topic.i dont want to censor ruck or you just need to be a little more reasonable this site needs you and ruck!
bo im not asking you to change your point of view you are very reasonable im asking you to help ones like ruck see your way and not be so abrasive.
ruck your comment is in bad taste!
bo i dont agree with anyone that wants to assassinate the president.but when dumb ass ruck insults people with a mental disorder then he insults me and i dont think he or you can when that argument with me enough said!
Post a Comment (200 characters or less)