|
|
|
Welcome to Outdoor Life
|
|
Optics Test '09
This year’s Optics Test features a range of accessible glass with an eye for value.
![]()
Zeiss PRF 8x26 T* Overall Rating: 4 stars The optics on this monocular/laser range finder are so good that we opened the field, previously limited to compact binoculars, to all optics with objective lenses smaller than 30mm. This device easily bested the category’s two binoculars in resolution and the low-light test. Credit Zeiss’s bright, clear glass and glare-reducing coatings, but also the unit’s intuitive, fast and accurate range finder, which utilizes Zeiss’s Ballistics Information System. Paired with a top-notch spotting scope, this 11-ounce optic is ideal when weight and portability are considerations and cost is not. ($795; zeiss.com/sports) Report Card Optical Quality: 1st Design: A Price/Value: B
AdvertisementADVERTISEMENTAdvertisement |
|
Photo Gallery Comments (18)
Some nice binocs there
I picked up a pair of Steiner Safari Pro's (compact 10x26)and for the price (about $125) they are great!
The Yukon Frontier are the best bang for your dollar out there. Clarity reminds me of Nikon Monarch. I beat mine up and the rubber armor protects it well
to conduct an optics test without Swarovski or Leupold is a joke. Please do not become a whore to your advertisers.
check your facts drabbit, OL does not "whore" to advertisers.
I just read the field tested article, An Eye for Value, June 2009. I cannot fathom why a field test of optics would not include the pinnacle of glass, Swarovski and Leupold. I use both in the field, and I have found no equal on the market. It is like comparing the 2008 NFL football teams this year and excluding the Arizona Cardinals and the Pittsburgh Steelers!
Yes indeed, you have tested the like of Zeiss & Leica bios which are the standard of excellence. BTW the prices DO reflect that. However, the Yukon spotting scopes is very well priced for the novice hunter/ birder or mountaineer/naturalist.
Hmm..you did not test any LEUPOLD products. Great products and MADE IN USA!
From the Editors: Outdoor Life sends invitations out to all of the optics manufacturers, months in advance of our annual optics test. They are invited to submit products but submissions are entirely voluntary on their part. Some manufacturers may simply choose not to submit products for testing.
The only stipulation we make is that: "Products must be new, innovative and substantively different from previous models in the same line." This ensures that we are delivering the latest product information to our readers.
Many optics manufacturers may not have new products available until mid-year, in which case we include them in the following year's test.
This may explain the absence of certain manufacturers in this year's test, though we can assure you that all were invited to make submissions.
Smitty's right. We invite all optics manufacturers to submit new products for our annual test, but we don't always get full participation. Also note that this is just the first round of reviews. We will feature results of our riflescope test in the August issue of Outdoor Life.
Andrew McKean
Hunting Editor
Wow, that is an impressive array of binoculars and scopes. Lots of choice over a wide price range has any buyer weighing his options. I bought the Nikon Monarch from a camera and optics shop. Yes, they were on sale...but it was also the binocular that I knew to be the choice of many birdwatchers. That's right, 'birdwatchers' ... these are guys who walk around with their binoculars glued to their faces. They have high expectations when it comes to clarity and comfort of use and are usually spend thrift individuals. I figured their endorsement was good enough for me. I can't speak for any of the other models but this one suits me just fine.
Not sure I agree with this review. It seems to me that if only a select group decided to send in a pair for review - good for them, they are getting some great exposure. I have been in the binocular business for almost a decade and I can't believe these results. Before anyone jumps on these binoculars, do some homework, there are MANY binoculars that are much better in quality.
awsome
Limiting your review to only new designs says the amazing Swarovski optics aren't worth considering because they were designed a year or two ago. That's BS, and it should be beneath the standard of Outdoor LIfe. A comparison of "current production models" head-to-head is what I want to see & it's what your readers deserve. This comparison would show what we need to know, what the market has to offer us & which we should pay for. PLEASE, fix your comparisons for your next "Optics Test". Invite manufacturers to submit all current production models & let's see who wins.
Thank you!
Great list of Binoculars & Spotting Scopes. Man, those Leica & Zeiss- quality products- AWESOME.
Glad to learn about YUKON - great value indeed.
If I may, would like You to consider some products from LEUPOLD next round.
Thanx!
Samson
sorry a ridiculous "test" comparing $3000 optics against $100. how do you figure your range of scores you gave the 4th rated glasses 3 stars & the 11th rates 3 stars
no real help to anyone
Scope looked nice when taken out of box but then window mount spring clip flew off the first time I turned knob to tighten before it was even close to being tight. I then turned zoom from 15 to 45 and back, seemed to work fine. I mounted to tripod and turned up to 45 and back and then was working my way up again and noticed it was not wanting to go farther. I raised my head up to look at setting and it was in middle of 15 X 45. I then noticed the base ring has a space like it's loose so I turned zoom a little more and it breaks off. I was amazed this new out of the box scope which received the best buy award and was the only reason I purchased it (to be honest) had just broken the first time I used it. I'm sending it back for refund.
[IMG]http://i725.photobucket.com/albums/ww253/jonemiles/YUKON-scope.jpg[/IMG]
does anyone know who David Morale is?
I just reviewed some of the comments and criticisms regarding this optics review. Who knew it would kick up such a fuss! Some contributors were very indignant that their products of choice were not represented. Remind me not to cut these guys off on the highway if they get angry over something so minor Outdoor Life explanation puts them beyond reproach but it must feel like eating crow to have to defend themselves. Remember the old fable about trying to please all of the people all of the time....
Post a Comment (200 characters or less)
From the Editors: Outdoor Life sends invitations out to all of the optics manufacturers, months in advance of our annual optics test. They are invited to submit products but submissions are entirely voluntary on their part. Some manufacturers may simply choose not to submit products for testing.
The only stipulation we make is that: "Products must be new, innovative and substantively different from previous models in the same line." This ensures that we are delivering the latest product information to our readers.
Many optics manufacturers may not have new products available until mid-year, in which case we include them in the following year's test.
This may explain the absence of certain manufacturers in this year's test, though we can assure you that all were invited to make submissions.
I picked up a pair of Steiner Safari Pro's (compact 10x26)and for the price (about $125) they are great!
Not sure I agree with this review. It seems to me that if only a select group decided to send in a pair for review - good for them, they are getting some great exposure. I have been in the binocular business for almost a decade and I can't believe these results. Before anyone jumps on these binoculars, do some homework, there are MANY binoculars that are much better in quality.
The Yukon Frontier are the best bang for your dollar out there. Clarity reminds me of Nikon Monarch. I beat mine up and the rubber armor protects it well
Yes indeed, you have tested the like of Zeiss & Leica bios which are the standard of excellence. BTW the prices DO reflect that. However, the Yukon spotting scopes is very well priced for the novice hunter/ birder or mountaineer/naturalist.
Hmm..you did not test any LEUPOLD products. Great products and MADE IN USA!
Smitty's right. We invite all optics manufacturers to submit new products for our annual test, but we don't always get full participation. Also note that this is just the first round of reviews. We will feature results of our riflescope test in the August issue of Outdoor Life.
Andrew McKean
Hunting Editor
Wow, that is an impressive array of binoculars and scopes. Lots of choice over a wide price range has any buyer weighing his options. I bought the Nikon Monarch from a camera and optics shop. Yes, they were on sale...but it was also the binocular that I knew to be the choice of many birdwatchers. That's right, 'birdwatchers' ... these are guys who walk around with their binoculars glued to their faces. They have high expectations when it comes to clarity and comfort of use and are usually spend thrift individuals. I figured their endorsement was good enough for me. I can't speak for any of the other models but this one suits me just fine.
Limiting your review to only new designs says the amazing Swarovski optics aren't worth considering because they were designed a year or two ago. That's BS, and it should be beneath the standard of Outdoor LIfe. A comparison of "current production models" head-to-head is what I want to see & it's what your readers deserve. This comparison would show what we need to know, what the market has to offer us & which we should pay for. PLEASE, fix your comparisons for your next "Optics Test". Invite manufacturers to submit all current production models & let's see who wins.
Thank you!
check your facts drabbit, OL does not "whore" to advertisers.
I just read the field tested article, An Eye for Value, June 2009. I cannot fathom why a field test of optics would not include the pinnacle of glass, Swarovski and Leupold. I use both in the field, and I have found no equal on the market. It is like comparing the 2008 NFL football teams this year and excluding the Arizona Cardinals and the Pittsburgh Steelers!
awsome
Great list of Binoculars & Spotting Scopes. Man, those Leica & Zeiss- quality products- AWESOME.
Glad to learn about YUKON - great value indeed.
If I may, would like You to consider some products from LEUPOLD next round.
Thanx!
Samson
sorry a ridiculous "test" comparing $3000 optics against $100. how do you figure your range of scores you gave the 4th rated glasses 3 stars & the 11th rates 3 stars
no real help to anyone
Scope looked nice when taken out of box but then window mount spring clip flew off the first time I turned knob to tighten before it was even close to being tight. I then turned zoom from 15 to 45 and back, seemed to work fine. I mounted to tripod and turned up to 45 and back and then was working my way up again and noticed it was not wanting to go farther. I raised my head up to look at setting and it was in middle of 15 X 45. I then noticed the base ring has a space like it's loose so I turned zoom a little more and it breaks off. I was amazed this new out of the box scope which received the best buy award and was the only reason I purchased it (to be honest) had just broken the first time I used it. I'm sending it back for refund.
[IMG]http://i725.photobucket.com/albums/ww253/jonemiles/YUKON-scope.jpg[/IMG]
does anyone know who David Morale is?
I just reviewed some of the comments and criticisms regarding this optics review. Who knew it would kick up such a fuss! Some contributors were very indignant that their products of choice were not represented. Remind me not to cut these guys off on the highway if they get angry over something so minor Outdoor Life explanation puts them beyond reproach but it must feel like eating crow to have to defend themselves. Remember the old fable about trying to please all of the people all of the time....
to conduct an optics test without Swarovski or Leupold is a joke. Please do not become a whore to your advertisers.
Some nice binocs there
Post a Comment (200 characters or less)