September 28, 2012
Is the Sportsmen's Act Doomed? Ask your Senator - 1
by Ben Lamb
Last week, the Sportsmen’s Act of 2012 came up for a vote on Unanimous Consent. For those of us who don’t spend our lives glued to C-Span or reading the Congressional Record, that means that a vote was held to pass a piece of legislation out of the Senate without going through a bunch of committees and other folderol.
Under the rules of the Senate, all 100 Senators needed to vote yes in order to move this bill forward. Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) stood up and said no.
Unfortunately, election-year politics sunk the timely passage of this bill. The Sportsmen’s Act of 2012 is a kind of “best of” mix tape of bills and reauthorizations of conservation programs that were penned by Republicans and Democrats alike.
That’s right, broad, bi-partisan support and a lot of across-the-aisle negotiations do work when we don’t let our personal ambitions get in the way. In fact, when the same bill was put forward as a Farm Bill amendment, Senator John Thune (R-South Dakota) was a co-sponsor.
But now, Congress is broken. Rather than let the chairman of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus move this legislation forward, some folks are trying to let it die on the vine. Congress currently enjoys about a 10 percent approval rating. With shenanigans like this, it’s not hard to see why 90 percent of the country thinks we’d be better off with the Keystone Cops running things.
Ultimately, the bill came up for a Cloture Motion this past Saturday, September 22, on National Hunting and Fishing Day. The motion passed 84-7. That means that Congress will address the bill when they come back after the election for their “lame duck” session.
In order to get the votes needed to move the bill forward, Senator Tester will need some help, and not just from the guys in the Brooks Brothers suits eating caviar. He needs us: the Camo Coalition.
I’ve known Jon Tester for a few years. He’s never been one to shirk a task or fade from a fight. I like that about him. I also like that he works across the aisle with Republicans. It was Jon Tester, who, along with Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson, got wolves delisted in the Northern Rockies, which caused a tidal wave of delistings across the U.S.
As Chairman of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus, Tester has led the effort to fund conservation programs that not only benefit wildlife, but benefit jobs, and our hunting industry. He’s been working on this bill since June.
Tester’s term as chairman comes to end when the gavel clangs and this Congressional session ends. We asked him about his tenure, and what he thinks about Congress’ reluctance to move legislation that benefits all of us. His reply was simple: “If this doesn’t pass, then we’ve failed as a Congress.” An 84-7 vote doesn’t happen in Congress anymore. Even naming a post office (the most banal and simple thing to do) gets hyper-political.
The Sportsmen’s Act of 2012 is the largest package of legislation for hunters and anglers in a generation. It’s time Congress stopped counting election cash and got to work helping people go hunt and fish. You can make a difference by — contacting your Senators and Representatives and urging them to move forward with this important legislation.
Here’s what the bill does:
HUNTING, FISHING AND RECREATIONAL ACCESS
Polar Bear Conservation and Fairness Act: This bill allows for the Secretary to authorize permits for re-importation of legally harvested Polar Bears from approved populations in Canada before the 2008 ban.
The Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Protection Act: This section specifically excludes ammo and fishing tackle from the Toxic Substances Control Act, leaving decisions about tackle to State Fish and Game Agencies and the Fish and Wildlife Service, who currently regulate ammo and tackle. The EPA has denied petitions to regulate tackle and ammo under TSCA in 1994 and again in 2011. This codifies that the EPA does not have the ability to regulate tackle. This includes a savings clause for local, state and other federal regulations.
Migratory Bird Habitat Investment and Enhancement Act: This section amends the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp Act so that the Secretary of the Interior, beginning in 2013 for three year periods, can set the amount to be collected for Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamps. It will require the Postal Service to collect the amount established by the Secretary for each Stamp that is sold for a hunting year.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Reauthorization: This section reauthorizes the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), a non-profit that preserves and restores our nation’s native wildlife species and habitats. Created by Congress in 1984, NFWF directs public conservation dollars to the most pressing environmental needs and matches those investments with private funds. Since its establishment, NFWF has awarded over 11,600 grants to more than 4,000 organizations in the United States, investing a total of $2 billion for conservation.
Multinational Species Conservation Fund Reauthorization: Section reauthorizes appropriations to carry out the African Elephant Conservation Act, the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994, the Asian Elephant Conservation Act of 1997, The Marine Turtle Conservation Act of 2003 and the Great Ape Conservation Act of 2000 for FY2012-FY2017. This will also allow for a five year extension on the corresponding postal stamps.
Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Reauthorization Act:This section would amend the Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Act of 2010 to require such stamps to be available for an additional four years; and provide five versions depicting African or Asian elephants, a rhinoceros, a tiger, a marine turtle or a great ape.
Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act Reauthorization (FTFLA): This section reauthorizes the BLM’s authority to sell land to private land owners, counties, companies and others for ranching, community development and various projects. This “Land for Land” approach creates jobs and generates funding for BLM, USFS, NPS and USFWS to acquire critical in-holdings from willing sellers. The sales revenue allows agencies to acquire high priority lands with important wildlife habitat value and recreational access for hunting and fishing.
Nutria Eradication and Control Act: This section would amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003.
About Open Country
Hunters and anglers across the nation consistently list one challenge as their primary obstacle to spending more time in the field: Access.
Outdoor Life's Open Country program aims to tackle that issue head on and with boots on the ground. The program highlights volunteer-driven efforts to improve access along with habitat improvements to make existing public lands even better places to hunt and fish. The program's goal is to substantially increase sportsman's access across the country by promoting events that make a difference.
Here on Open Country's blog page, contributors take a close look at access issues across the country. Some are public-policy discussions, where we investigate the nuances of public access. In other blogs, we shine a light on attempts to turn public recreation opportunities into private hunting and fishing domains. In still other blogs, we interview decision makers about access issues. Together, we fight for the ability of America's hunters and anglers to have a place to swing a gun or wet a line.
We promise the discussion is always lively, interesting, and fresh, so visit this page frequently to tune into the latest access issue.
The Open Country program culminates in grants and awards with top projects and participants being honored.