Land & Water Conservation Fund Clears Major Hurdle | Outdoor Life

Open Country

Join the fight to access your public lands

Open Country Header

Land & Water Conservation Fund Clears Major Hurdle

The House Committee on Natural Resources passed a bill that would permanently authorize the fund. The bill still needs to pass the full house, Senate, and President

rob bishop LWCF

Rob Bishop (middle) is the chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources which passed a bill to permanently authorize the LWCF.

U.S. Department of Interior

The lawmakers in Congress are acting a bit like characters in an Indiana Jones movie, snatching up the holy grail of conservation programs (the Land & Water Conservation Fund) as it teetered over the edge of a cliff.

Remember the backstory: The Land & Water Conservation Fund is one of the most powerful tools America has for conserving habitat and protecting access to the outdoors. Since 1965, LWCF has taken royalties from off-shore oil drilling and directed millions of dollars toward wildlife habitat, fishing access sites, along with urban parks and amenities. If you hunt and fish, odds are you’ve benefited from some investment of LWCF dollars.

The drama? LWCF is set to expire on Sept. 30. Sportsmen and conservationists teamed up to push for permanent authorization and full funding.

Progress was stalled in the highly partisan atmosphere of the House of Representatives Natural Resource Committee. Until yesterday, when that committee passed a HR 502, supported by both Democrats and Republicans, to reauthorize the law. That committee was widely seen as THE major hurdle to reauthorization, besides time and political inertia.

But the movie isn’t over yet. That bill still must pass the full House, pass the Senate, and be signed by President Trump. There are probably more hidden traps and venomous snakes to avoid. But the prize is in reach.

Here’s what HR 502 would do:

  • Permanent reauthorization of LWCF (avoiding the need for future brinksmanship).
  • Sets 40 percent of the funding aside for “stateside” projects (as opposed to federal projects like national forests, national wildlife refuges or national parks).
  • Doubles the requirement for funding projects with specific benefits for hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation, from 1.5 percent to 3 percent.

The bill does NOT authorize a specific funding level. So there remains more work to be done.

“We’re thrilled that Chairman Bishop and Ranking Member Grijalva are working together on a compromise that advances the Land and Water Conservation Fund in a meaningful way. We’re now one step closer to permanently reauthorizing LWCF,” said Julia Peebles, Government Relations Manager for Backcountry Hunters & Anglers.