Gun News: Trump Nominates ‘Safe Pick’ Christopher Wray as FBI Director
Plus: Federal NFA Database ‘Seriously Flawed’
TOP STORY
Trump Nominates ‘Safe Pick’ Wray To Be FBI Director
President Trump nominated former federal prosecutor Christopher A. Wray to be his FBI director in an early morning tweet on June 7. Hours later, the White House published an official statement in which Trump called Wray “an impeccably qualified individual,” citing his role in major fraud investigations and anti-terrorism efforts at the Justice Department after the 9/11 attacks.
“I know that he will again serve his country as a fierce guardian of the law and model of integrity once the Senate confirms him to lead the FBI,” Trump said in the statement.
Trump abruptly fired former FBI Director James B. Comey on May 9, saying the move was necessary to allow a “new beginning” at the FBI. Comey, of course, had been supervising investigations of Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election and the possibility of cooperation between people linked to Trump’s campaign and Moscow.
Comey had been widely criticized by Democrats and Republicans for his handling of the contentious investigations, as well as the inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s email practices while she was Secretary of State.
Comey had become a lightning rod, of sorts, with his every move examined and debated by pundits. The partisans and ideologues — the scourge of our times — sucked any oxygen from intelligent analysis of his actions, or from any attempt to conduct an intelligent analysis of anyone else’s actions.
Wray, on the other hand, has pretty much kept his head down in a career of dutiful soldiering and proverbial ditch-digging. His most visible stray into controversy was serving as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s attorney in the so-called Bridgegate scandal.
Therefore, it is uncertain how gun owners should respond to Wray’s nomination. While the FBI director does not impose law or craft policy, as the chief executive of the federal government’s primary law enforcement agency, whoever holds the position is, in contemporary vernacular, an “influencer.”
Before announcing his decision, Trump met with Wray and the other apparent finalist, John S. Pistole, the former administrator of the United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and a former FBI deputy director.
According to Glenn Thrush and Julie Hirschfeld Davis of The New York Times, “Mr. Wray is a safe, mainstream pick from a president who at one point was considering politicians for a job that has historically been kept outside of partisanship. A former assistant attorney general overseeing the Justice Department’s criminal division under President George W. Bush, Mr. Wray is likely to allay the fears of FBI agents who worried that Mr. Trump would try to weaken or politicize the FBI.”
For more, go to:
— Trump Picks Christopher Wray to Be FBI Director
— 10 Things to Know About Christopher Wray, President Trump’s Pick For FBI Director
— Christopher Wray: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
— What Christopher Wray Learned From the Last Two FBI Directors
— President Trump nominates Christopher Wray to head the FBI
BATFE’S NFRTR FOILED
Federal NFA Database ‘Seriously Flawed’
The National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) database, which is the central registry of all National Firearms Act-regulated firearms in the United States not in the government’s possession, is “seriously flawed,” writes David T. Hardy on June 7 in his ‘Of Arms and the Law’ blog.
Hardy, an attorney and author, filed a 2007 Freedom of Information (FOIL) suit in the D.C. District Court seeking documents related to Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits of the NFRTR, which is what the Bureau of Tobacco, Alcohol, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) uses in felony prosecutions to establish that a gun is not registered.
He reports that among files he had received there are OIG surveys of BATFE’s Industry Operations Inspectors. This has “produced some interesting conclusions from the people assessing citizen compliance,” Hardy writes.
Among them, according to Hardy:
“OIG asked how often there was a discrepancy between the inventory and what the NFRTR said the inventory should be: 46 percent of inspectors said either always or most of the time. (Only 5 percent reported never). How often was the discrepancy found in the NFRTR? 44 percent said always or most of the time, only 6 percent said never.”
Meanwhile, Hardy notes, “Demonstrably unreliable records haven’t stopped felony prosecutions” even though, “in their own words, some of the inspectors say they know the register will be incomplete or inaccurate, that discrepancies in the NFRTR make it impossible to verify the onsite inventory, and that they will encounter discrepancies on a daily basis.”
For more, go to:
— NFA database seriously flawed
— FOIL Response Confirms NFRTR Data Unreliable for Prosecutions
— Gun Control Groups Are Losing The Battle Against Suppressors
— Firearms Industry Sees Slight Decline
— The Loophole in Background Check Thinking: Criminals Obey the Law
— NRA host calls out Kim Kardashian’s ‘mental illnesses’ over gun control rant
STATE ROUNDUP
Michigan Poised To Become 15th State To Restore Constitutional Carry
Michigan could become the 15th state — the fourth in 2017 — to restore Constitutional Carry and “allow” any legal firearm owner to carry a concealed firearm without a permit or mandatory training of the state Senate approved four bills adopted by the House last week.
The Michigan House approved H.B. 4416, H.B. 4417, H.B. 4418 and H.B. 4419, mostly along party line votes. The bills now go to the Senate. If passed by the Senate and signed by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder, the four proposed bills would:
Allow anyone to carry a concealed pistol without having to get a permit or training except for people who are prohibited by state or federal law from possessing a firearm because of certain criminal convictions.
Remove carrying a firearm — whether it’s concealed or not — from laws that prohibit carrying dangerous weapons.
Repeal a provision that allows security guards to only carry a concealed weapon when they’re on duty.
If the Senate approves the bills and the governor signs them into law, Michigan would become the fourth state in 2017 to restore Constitutional Carry, joining Missouri, where legislators overrode a governor’s veto, New Hampshire and North Dakota.
For more, go to:
— Michigan’s Concealed Carry Weapon Bills Pass House
— Florida: Parents of Pulse shooting victim want tougher gun laws
— North Carolina: Concealed gun bill gets mixed reviews from gun owners
— New Jersey Assembly passes bill to regulate toy guns
— Michigan bill would basically eliminate concealed pistol license
— Rhode Island: Gun Owners Need to Make a Strong Statement with Session End Quickly Approaching
— California: New Bill Restricting Gun Ownership for Hate Crime Offenders
— Texas: Austin leaders nix nomination of gun rights activist to city panel
— Questions about Pennsylvania gun laws? Seminar looks to provide answers
— Kansas: Wichita State professor resigns amid concealed carry gun laws
— Oregon: Gun confiscation bill needs to go
IN THE COURTS
Ohio Judge Gives Suit Against University Gun Ban The Green Light
Ohio law gives universities and colleges the option to allow concealed weapons on their campuses, but most still ban firearms. A lawsuit filed in November by Students for Concealed Carry Foundation, Ohioans for Concealed Carry and Mike Newbern (an Ohio State University student and former instructor), could force universities to consider conceal carry laws when students demand their rights be respected.
Marion County Common Judge, Jim Slagle, ruled on May 5 that the lawsuit against Ohio State University can proceed. OSU and other universities had requested it be dismissed.
Newbern and the gun rights groups are asking the courts to strike down OSU policies that, they say, limit possession of handguns, even in locked vehicles. Newbern, who plans to take graduate classes at OSU’s Marion campus in the fall, has a conceal-carry license. He says in his suit that he doesn’t want to have to leave his gun at home when he travels to and from campus.
“For me personally, living in Delaware, I’m disarmed when I’m traveling to and from Marion,” Newbern said. If he kept his gun in his car, he said, “I face potential expulsion and never being able to work in the university again.”
The suit contends that state law doesn’t allow state universities to ban the storage of guns in vehicles. It says the university unlawfully imposes such a ban in three places: the student code of conduct, rules for employees and policies for recreational sports programs.
Ohio State said it does not ban guns in vehicles for employees. Beyond that, a university statement said its policies comply with state law. A spokesman told the Associated Press that, because of the lawsuit, he could not say whether the university permits students or visitors to store guns in their vehicles.
For more, go to:
— Lawsuit tests restrictions on guns on campuses
— Gun advocate targets concealed-carry bans on Ohio campuses
— Gun Rights Group Appealing Dismissal Of Suit Against Katie Couric
— WATCH: VA. Gun Rights Group To Appeal Dismissal Of $12M Defamation Lawsuit Against Katie Couric